Indication of bitewing radiographs in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical guidelines.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47990/zksk6y70

Keywords:

Dental caries/diagnosis; Dental radiography; bitewing radiography; adolescents

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: to identify and to analyse current guidelines/directives on the use of bitewing radiograph among adolescents, evaluating the evidence supporting the parameters used for its indication and for the determination of the time interval prescribed between successive shots for the caries diagnosis. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in 2022/23, in Spanish, English and Portuguese to identify papers classifiable as “guides”, “guidelines” or “directives” for the use of bitewing radiography. Two reviewers consulted MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS and Google Scholar.  Each guideline was analysed according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). RESULTS: Six guidelines and five documents were included. Five guidelines comply adequately with domain 1 but none of them included patient’s opinions or preferences. They are based on expert opinion, with adequate and clear language. Only two guidelines members declare having no conflicts of interest. While ADA    2012, AAPD 2017, EAPD 2019, ITALIA 2019 suggest using the presence of caries lesions/caries risk assessment as an indicator for taking Rx at the first visit, the others do not present an indicator or do so in all patients and documents indicate key ages for radiographic examination. The frequency varies according to the risk assessment and presence of caries lesion. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus in parameters used for the indication/timing and frequency of radiographs examination, however, the guidelines condemns the indiscriminate use of radiographs. The frequency should be established in relation to the baseline conditions and determining factors present. Frequencies less than 12 months require justification.

References

REFERENCIAS:

1. Bader, J D, Shugars, D A, & Bonito, A J A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent. 2002 Fall; 62 (4): 201-13.

2. Nyvad, B. Diagnosis versus Detection of Caries. Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun; 38(3): 192-8.

3. Foster Page, L A, Boyd, D, Fuge, K, Stevenson, A, Goad, K, Sim, D, & Thomson, W M. The effect of bitewing radiography on estimates of dental caries experience among children differs according to their disease experience. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Aug 9; 18 (1): 137.

4. Carvalho, J C, Mestrinho, H, Guillet, A, & Maltz, M. Radiographic yield for clinical caries diagnosis in young adults: Indicators for radiographic examination. Caries Res. 2020; 54(2): 154-64.

5. Schwendicke, F, Tzschoppe, M, & Paris, S. Radiographic caries detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Aug; 43 (8), 924-33.

6. Hopcraft, M S., & Morgan, M V. Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in young adult population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005 Jun; 33 (3):212-8.

7. Wenzel, A. Radiographic display of carious lesions and cavitation in approximal surfaces: advantages and drawbacks of conventional and advanced. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 May; 72 (4): 251-64.

8. Hintze H, Lussi A, Cuisinier F & Nyvad B. Additional caries detection methods. En Fejerskov, O, Nyvad, B, & Kidd, E. Dental Caries: the disease and its Clinical Management (3 rd. Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. 211-29.

9. Bernabé, E, & Sheiham, A. Extent of differences in dental caries in permanent teeth between childhood and adulthood in 26 countries. Int Dent J. 2014 Oct; 64(5):241-5.

10. WHO: Country/Area Project Profile Database. (September 2016). WHO Collaborating Center for Education, Trainen and Research in Oral Health. Malmo University. Retrieved from http://www.mah.se/capp; 2016 Sep.

11. Goodwin T L, Devlin H, Glenny AM, O'Malley L, Horner K. Guidelines on the timing and frequency of bitewing radiography: a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2017 Apr 7; 222(7):519-26.

12. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. (2004). Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ea20b522-883e-11e5-b8b7-01aa75ed71a1#

13. Oenning, A C., Jacobs, R, Pauwels, R, Stratis, A, Hedesiu, M, & Salmon, B. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Mar; 48(3):308-16.

14. WHO [internet] https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/adolescence/dev/es/.

Citado: 4 agosto 2020.

15. Brouwers M C, Kho M E, Browman G P, Burgers J S, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham I D, Grimshaw J, Hanna S E, Littlejohns P, Makarski J, Zitzelsberger L; AGREE Next Steps Consortium.AGREE II: Advancing guideline development reporting and evaluation in healthcare. CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14; 182(18):E839-42.

16. Scottish dental clinical effectiveness programme. Oral Health Assessment and Review Dental Clinical Guidance. 2012; Retrieved from http://www.sdcep.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SDCEP-OHAR-Version1.0.pdf (accessed Oct 2019)

17. National child oral health services clinical guide. 2010. Retrieved from htp://oralhealth.hiirc.org.nz/page/30129/posteriorbitewingpbwguidelineforchild/?q=bitewing&section_9005

18. Firetto M C, Abbinante A, Barbato E, Bellomi M, Biondetti P, Borghesi A, Bossu M, Cascone P, Corbella D, Di Candido V, Diotallevi P, Farronato G, Federici A, Gagliani M, Granata C, Guerra M, Magi A, Maggio MC, Mirenghi S, Nardone M, Origgi D, Paglia L, Preda L, Rampado O, Rubino L, Salerno S, Sodano A, Torresin A, Strohmenger L. National guidelines for dental diagnostic imaging in the developmental age. Radiol Med. 2019 Sep; 124(9):887-916.

19. Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal M S, Spyridonos M L, Rajasekharan S, Sobczak M, Stratigaki E, Van Acker J W G, Aps J K M, Horner K, Tsiklakis K. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Aug; 21(4):375-86.

20. American Dental Association. Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental Radiographic Examinations: Recommendations for Patient Selection and Limiting Radiation Exposure. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 2012. [Accessed December 2019]. Available from: http://www.ada. org/∼/media/ADA/Member%20Center/FIles/Dental_Radiographic_Examinations_2012.ashx

21. American Association of Paediatric Dentistry.

Prescribing Dental Radiographs for Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Individuals with Special Health Care Needs. Pediatr Dent. 2017 Sep 15; 39(6):205-07. PMID: 29179358.

22. Mejare, I. Bitewing examination to detect caries in children and adolescents: when and how

often? Dent Update. 2005 Dec; 32(10): 588-90, 593-4, 596-7.

23. Steiner, M., Buhlmann, S., Menghini, G., Imfeld, C., & Imfeld, T. Caries risks and appropriate

intervals between bitewing X-ray examinations in schoolchildren. Schweiz Monatsschr

Zahnmed. 2011; 121 (1):12-24.

24. Jenson, L, Budenz, A, Featherstone, J, Ramos-Gomez, FJ, Spolsky, V W, & Young, D A.

Clinical Protocols for Caries Management by Risk Assessment. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007Oct;

35(10): 714-23.

25. Cordeiro, R L, & Braga de Abreu-e-Lima, F C. Indicaciones de radiografias en

odontopediatría. En M. L. de Andrade Massara, & P. C. Barbosa Rédua, Manual de

referencia para procedimientos clínicos en odontopediatría. Livraria Santos Editora Ltda.

2010: 69-77

26. Langlois, C D, Mahl, C R, & Fontanella, V. Diretrizes para a indicação de examenes

radiográficos en odontología. R. ABRO. 2007; 8(2): 32-8.

27. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical

Practice Guideline. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. In M. Field,

& K. Lohr (Eds.). Washington (DC). 1990.

28. Petersen, P E, & Lennon, M A. Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental caries

in the 21st century: the WHO approach. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Oct; 32 (5):

319-21.

29. Costa, A M, Bezzerra, A C, & Fuks, A B. Assessment of the accuracy of visual examination,

bitewing radiographs and DIAGNOdent on the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Eur Arch

Paediatr Dent. 2007 Jun; 8(2), 118-22.

30. Bahrololoomi, Z, Ezoddini, F, Halvani, N. Comparison of Radiography, Laser Fluorescence

and Visual Examination for Diagnosing Incipient Occlusal Caries of Permanent First Molars.

J Dent (Tehran). 2015 May; 12(5), 324-32.

31. Oliveira, RS, Zenkner, JE, Maltz, M, & Rodrigues, JA. Association between two visual

criteria in assessing non-cavitated caries lesion activity on occlusal surfaces of permanent

molars. Clin Oral Invest. 2015; 19, 565-8.

32. Gimenez, T, Piovesan, C, Braga, M M, & Raggio, D P Visual Inspection for Caries Detection:

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015 Jul; 94(7): 895-904.

33. Machiulskiene, V, Nyvad, B, & Baelum, V. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and

radiographic caries examinations in children of different age. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2004 Sep;

5(3): 157-62.

34. Chu, C, Chung, B, & Lo, E. Caries assessment by clinical examination with or without

radiographs of young Chinese adults. Int Dent J. 2008; 58, 265-68.

35. Pitts, N, Ismail, A I, Martignon, S, Ekstrand, K, Douglas, G V, & Longbottom, ICCMSTM

Guide for practitioners and educators.2014 Dec; Retrieved July 2020

36. Gomez, J, Tellez, M, Pretty, I A, Ellwood, R P, & Ismail, I. Non-cavitated carious lesions

detection methods: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb; 41(1), 54-66.

37. Gowda, S, Thomson, W M, Foster Page, L A, Croucher, N A. What difference does using

bitewing radiographs make to epidemiological estimates of dental caries prevalence and

severity in a young adolescent population with high caries experience? Caries Res. 2009;

43(6): 436–41.

37. Anderson, M, Stecksen-Blicks, C, Stenlund H, Ranggard, L., Tsilingaridis, G., & Mejare,

I. Detection of approximal caries in 5-year-old Swedish children. Caries Res. 2005 Mar;

Apr; 39 (2):92-9.

38. Lillehagen, M, Grinderfjord, M, & Mejare, I. Detection of approximal caries by clinical and

radiographic examination in 9-year-old Swedish children. Caries Res. 2007; 41(3): 177-85.

39. Apps, J K, Lim, L Z, Tong, H J, Kalia, B, & Chou, A M. Diagnostic efficacy of and

indications for intraoral radiographs in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review. Eur Arch

Paediatr Dent. 2020 Aug; 21(4): 429-62.

40. Alvarez L, Alves L S, Fabruccini A, Maltz M. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical

indicators for added value of radiography in caries diagnosis in adolescents: A cross-sectional

study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022 Jun; 133(6):725-32.

41. Cagetti, M G, Bontá, G, Cocco, F, Lingstrom, P, Strohmenger, L., & Campus, G. Are

standardized caries risk assessment models effective in assessing actual caries status and

future caries increment? A systematic review. BMC Oral health.2018 Jul 16; 18(1): 123-33.

42. Tellez, M. Gomez, J, Pretty, I, Ellwood, R, & Ismail, A. Evidence on existing caries risk

assessment systems: are they predictive of future caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.

2013 Feb; 41(1): 67-78.

43. Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Dahlén G, Espelid I, Norlund A, Tranæus S, Twetman S. Caries risk

assessment. A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Feb; 72(2):81-91.

44. Mejare, I, Kallestal, C, Stenlund, H, & Johansson, H. Caries Development from 11to 22Years

of Age: A Prospective Radiographic Study. Caries Res. 1998; 32(1): 10-6.

45. Carvalho, J C. Caries process on occlussal surfaces: evolving evidence and understanding.

Caries Res. 2014; 48 (4): 339-46.

Published

2025-09-28

Issue

Section

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

How to Cite

Indication of bitewing radiographs in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical guidelines. (2025). Latin American Pediatric Dentistry Journal, 15. https://doi.org/10.47990/zksk6y70